[python] MI5-Persecution: No Justice for the Victims of MI5 (29074)

[Petr Láslo]

Dobrej SPAM :-D

> ------------ Původní zpráva ------------
> Od:  <MI5-Victim na mi5.gov.uk>
> Předmět: [python] MI5-Persecution: No Justice for the Victims of MI5 (29074)
> Datum: 16.12.2007 18:35:18
> ----------------------------------------
> 
> MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 11 June, 1999
> 
> Harassment in a pub in Clapham, Tuesday lunchtime
> 
> Once a month, or once every other month, I meet a Polish friends of mine
> who lives in Clapham North, and sometimes we go to a particular pub near
> where he lives. The last time was some two months ago; I did not have my
> minidisc-walkman with me, and consequently was seriously harassed by
> people MI5 had instructed to harass me, in the pub.
> 
> This Tuesday, 8 June 1999, we again went to the same pub for a pre-meal
> drink. This time I did have my minidisc-walkman with me. As you can guess,
> we were followed into the pub by a couple of young people (Im getting
> older and older - isnt it funny how the MI5 agents all look young these
> days?). They started talking about my situation, in particular some travel
> I had booked the previous day. Unfortunately, they were talking fairly
> quietly, and my minidisc didnt pick up their speech.
> 
> MI5s schizophrenic reasoning is that simultaneously I am very important
> and worthy of their acts of persecution, and I am also totally unimportant
> and their abuse of me "doesnt matter". Perhaps they should test their
> agents and managers for obsessive personalities or psychotic features in
> the same way as employees are drug-tested. MI5 might lose their "worst
> cases" employees if some psychological testing were applied to their
> recruitment procedure.
> 
> Toothless Watchdogs. What a Surprise.
> 
> Recently I have been engaging in communications with two watchdogs, the
> Security Service Tribunal which deals with complaints against the security
> service (and always clears MI5 of any wrongdoing), and the Data Protection
> Registrar, which is mandated to investigate misuse of personal data held
> on computer.
> 
> In a letter to Nick Brooks, Security Service Tribunal secretary, dated 20
> April, I asked him if the Tribunal, as an allegedly independent body, had
> the means to investigate complaints against MI5 other than asking MI5 to
> themselves investigate complaints. To my disappointment, his reply two
> weeks later answered the question only indirectly, in the
> negative. Whatever the reader might think of the merits of the case I have
> been putting before you in faxed articles this last year and half, you
> will surely recognise that it is a significant anomaly for the Tribunal to
> have no independent means of investigating complaints, particularly given
> the view expressed even by previous home secretaries that the security
> services are untrustworthy.
> 
> 
> 
> MI5 Persecution: No Justice for the Victims of MI5
> 
> In a previous article I detailed the similarities between the current MI5
> Persecution in England, and other historical instances of similar
> persecution, notably that by the Nazi Germans in the thirties and
> forties. The Germans persecuted first the mentally ill, the epileptics and
> those suffering from schizophrenia, then moved on to racial groups; in
> todays Britain the persecution is again directed at those with mental
> illness, which the British in their cowardice find easier than taking on
> racial groups as the Germans did. But just as in Thirties Germany there
> was no recourse against a malign and omnipotent state, so the MI5 Secret
> Police in the modern British Fascist State allow no justice for their
> victims.
> 
> No Recourse Against the Security Services Illegal Harassment
> 
> It has become apparent to me over the last nine years just how loaded the
> dice are in todays Britain, a fundamentally fascist country which
> masquerades as a democracy. Britain is a democracy in name only; the
> Establishment, the defence and MI5 secret police are always there,
> regardless of which party has been voted into power most recently - and
> from "New Labours" conduct in office one finds it difficult to tell them
> apart from Old Tories, in their crackdowns on the sick and vulnerable in
> society.
> 
> In thirties Germany the victims of the Nazi regime had no legal recourse
> against their State oppressors; and in todays Fascist British state, the
> victims of the Establishment and its MI5 Secret Police similarly have no
> recourse against the illegal state-funded and organised oppression. There
> is supposed to be a mechanism for dealing with MI5 crimes, in the shape of
> the Security Service Tribunal and Commissioner; yet these have never found
> favour of a plaintiff. One might as well ask the Nazi SS to investigate
> crimes against epileptics or Jews as ask the Security Service Tribunal to
> investigate MI5 crimes against British citizens; it is quite obvious what
> the answer is going to be, regardless of what you say to them, and what
> evidence you provide. The Tribunal and Commissioner are a mere formality,
> a whitewashing body to give the Secret Services a veneer beneath which
> they hide their shabby criminality.
> 
> "Institutional Racism" and Bigotry in the Metropolitan Police
> 
> The recent inquiry into the racist murder of Stephen Lawrence found clear
> evidence of systematic and deliberate racism in the Metropolitan Police,
> which cannot have surprised anyone. Commissioner Sir Paul Condon accepted
> a somewhat lukewarm definition of institutional racism as being
> "unconscious". In truth, and this truth must surely be obvious to anyone
> who has any familiarity or encountered the great British police, the Met
> has not just "unconscious" racism, but very clearly "conscious" and
> deliberate racism, of the kind that would have done Thirties Germans
> proud. And it is a bastion of such open racism - when many other parts of
> society are learning to live in a multicultural environment, the Met is
> still living in the past in its attitude to the minorities.
> 
> But in addition to the systematic racism confirmed by the Lawrence
> inquiry, there is also something much more relevant to this case, which is
> systematic police bigotry against the physically and mentally disabled,
> which I personally have experienced in my dealings with the police over
> the years. You cannot expect equal treatment if you are mentally
> disabled. I tried to make a complaint to the police in 1995 about the
> harassment I had been subjected to for several years. As soon as they
> found out I had mental illness, they refused to even talk to me. I tried
> again in March 1999; the police made various threats to me, while ranting
> about "your paranoid rubbish" in reference to the complaints expressed to
> them.
> 
> The police refusal to do the job they are employed and paid to do is
> extremely serious, particularly as this case is highly important, indeed
> key to the whole issue of British self-perception at the end of the 20th
> century and the beginning of the 21st century. Britain has lost much in
> the last fifty years - it has lost an empire, it has lost its self-respect
> and its identity as a people. If the MI5 persecution finally makes it into
> the light and the Security Services are seen for the rather cheap bullies
> their behaviour indicates, it will have a massive and harmful effect on
> British self-perception in the new century.
> 
> Security Service Tribunal  - Blatant Whitewashing
> 
> A few weeks ago I spoke on the phone to Nick Brooks, the Secretary of the
> Security Service Tribunal, which is supposed to deal with cases of MI5
> transgression. I asked him if the Tribunal had ever found in favour of a
> plaintiff and against the Security Service. He answered that as far as he
> knew, it had not.
> 
> I also asked Mr Brooks if the Tribunal had any means of investigating
> allegations of criminal activity by MI5, other than asking MI5 themselves
> if they had engaged in such activity. His rather circuitous written reply
> states that the 1989 Security Service Act provides that "it shall be the
> duty of every member of the Service to disclose or give to the Tribunal
> such documents or information as they may require for the purpose of
> enabling them to carry out their functions under this Act". Which is a
> very round-about way of saying - "No" - the Tribunal has no way of
> investigating MI5 crimes - None At All.
> 
> Setting up the S.S. Tribunal, and creating a Security Service
> Commissioner, was really an act of falsehood by the government. It is
> generally recognised that MI5 are out of reach of the normal criminal
> justice system - the police, as we have seen, have no intesot answer to
> the government; in a previous article I quoted Roy Jenkins speaking of "a
> secretive atmosphere.... secretive vis-a-vis the government as well as
> [enemies]", and a "lack of frankness" from MI5.
> 
> If the government wanted to, it could reform the secret services and
> ensure they acted in conformance with the laws which have been enacted for
> them in the last ten years. But apparently the present government does not
> see any need to ensure security service compliance with the law. As noted
> above, the regulatory machinery for MI5 is deliberately weak; the Tribunal
> has no independent means of investigation, and it is simply a waste of
> time complaining to the Tribunal or Commissioner.
> 
> Every so often, fresh revelations come to light of secret service
> transgressions. We have heard from Shayler that MI5 bugged Jack Straw and
> Peter Mandelson; we have heard from Peter Wright that MI5 plotted to see
> Wilson ejected from office; yet so closed is the system of government that
> the law is never enforced against MI5 when they "bug and burgle" everyone
> from politicians to ordinary citizens.
> 
> No Justice from the Legal System, either
> 
> Britain has a civil and criminal justice system which effectively limits
> many complaints from being heard. For a civil complaint to be brought
> before a court, you need a solicitor willing to act on your
> behalf. Supposedly it is possible to represent yourself as a
> Litigant-in-Pthe basis of being "frivolous and vexatious" or "disclosing
> no cause for action in law". This is exactly what happened to me in 1997
> when I twice tried to take the BBC to court for spying on me in my living
> room at home; my case was twice struck out, and on the second occasion an
> order was made against me that I could not bring further civil litigation
> against the BBC without leave of the court.
> 
> As the reader can guess it is quite impossible for a person with
> schizophrenia, who complains about the secret services and media
> interfering in his life, to find a solicitor willing to represent him in
> legal action against the persecutors. I have quite a lot of evidence of
> the continuing persecution which I have posted on the website, even if the
> evidence is quite tentative and perhaps open to varying
> interpretations. But I have tried several firms of solicitors; some of
> them have acted unprofessionally and abused me; all of them have refused
> to represent me. My psychiatrist gave me the name of the firm of Bindman
> and Partners in central London, and I have approached them twice. On each
> occasion they refused to accept my instructions. Plainly the problem with
> Bindmans, which they have admitted, is their bigotry against mentally
> disabled people; yet this is not just something that is wrong with
> Bindmans, it is something that is wrong with the legal system as a whole,
> since the legal system necessitates finding a solicitor willing to
> represent you in order to bring a case to court, but it does not have a
> mechanism for providing a lawyer in the case where no solicitor is willing
> to take on your case. So the British legal system is such as to prevent
> cases such as mine from ever receiving an airing in a court.
> 
> So much for the civil courts. But the criminal justice system is no
> better. Two years ago the Protection from Harassment Act came into
> force. But again, while the Act is all very well on paper, in practice it
> is unenforceable in my case, since it would require Police action to see
> the law implemented, and if the police cannot even be trusted to conduct a
> murder investigation competently (in the Lawrence case), then what chance
> is there of their investigating complaints against the Security
> Service? Of course, it would be possible for me to personally issue
> proceedings through a private prosecution either against MI5 themselves,
> or against one or more of their media tools; but here we see the same
> problems as with the civil courts, because first of all I would have to
> find a lawyer willing to act on my behalf. Litigants-in-person do exist in
> the criminal courts, but the Attorney General can bring such a prosecution
> to an end by taking it over and entering a plea of "nolle prossequi"; and
> I suspect that if I were to bring a private prosecution against either MI5
> or one of their media tools, then this is exactly what would happen.
> 
> So much for British justice. But if anything the wrongs that have been
> perpetrated on me by the British justice system are quite mild to what
> others have suffered. Others have been wrongly convicted based on police
> evasions and lies, and spent many years in jail based on false charges. I
> should count myself lucky that despite the best efforts of the MI5 secret
> police, I have not acquired any criminal charges or convictions; which
> shows that for all their resources and influence, and the clear
> imperfections in the British legal system, there are still limits on how
> much subversion MI5 can achieve.
> 
> The latest in a long line of injustices
> 
> A comment I heard during the recent scandal of the police mishandling of
> the Lawrence murder investigation is that "its not as if the police
> themselves murdered him". This is not a particularly wise statement to
> make about the case, since it could be argued that the four alleged
> murderers were aided in their crime by the expectation that the police
> would deliberately botch the investigation - which of course is exactly
> what the police did.
> 
> But in my case, this would be a completely inaccurate thing to say - since
> the MI5 secret-police have expressly been trying to nine years now to see
> an end put to my life, either by having me incarcerated and my liberty
> ended, or by forcing self-termination on me. It is exactly as if the
> secret police "themselves murdered [me]", since that is what their aim is
> in their campaign against me.
> 
> The public has heard of instances of police mishandling of cases, of
> police manufacturing evidence, lying in court, extracting false
> confessions to clear up crimes, et cetera. Various instances of
> extra-legal activity by the secret services have also come to light in the
> last few years. The unhappy truth is that what MI5 have been doing to me
> for the last nine years is really nothing out of the ordinary for them. To
> me it seems unbelievable that this sort of systematic campaign of
> harassment, which thousands and thousands of people in this country and
> abroad are well aware of, could exist for such a long period of time with
> the media maintaining "omerta". But my case is not the first such instance
> of persecution by the "British secret police", and judging by the lack of
> any real controls on MI5, I very much doubt it will be the last.
> 
> 29074
> 
> 
> --
> Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
>       ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
> Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
> _______________________________________________
> Python mailing list
> Python na py.cz
> http://www.py.cz/mailman/listinfo/python
> 
> 
> 

S pozdravem Petr Láslo
ICQ: 491-577-497
Skype: petr.laslo
MSN: petr.laslo na volny.cz

<a href="http://forum.i-extra.net" title="Merlin'sfórum:php,mysql,xhtml,css,windows,linux,pc grafika, kritika webu a mnoho dalších">Fórum o PHP,MySQL,(X)HTML,CSS atd.</a>

<A HREF="http://merlin.i-extra.net">Mé portfolio</A>
<A HREF="http://www.emailing.cz/registrace.php?ref=roman2008@seznam.cz">Získejte peníze přes internet !</A>